A case about to be decided by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit could stop Obamacare dead in its tracks in 36 states. ‘Halbig v Burwell’ is based on an illegal action taken by the Internal Revenue Service in 2012. Below I will outline that illegal action and the two sections of the PPACA (Obamacare) that are relevant in this case.
State-based exchanges and federally facilitated exchanges
Section 1311 of the PPACA describes state-based health insurance exchanges. That section outlines the powers granted to the IRS to provide APTC – “Advance Premium Tax Credits” (a.k.a. ‘subsidies’) that will be used to artificially lower the high cost of health insurance offered in a state-based exchange. Tied to those APTC’s is also the power granted to the IRS to levy a $2,000 or $3,000 excise tax (non-tax deductible) on all employers with 50 or more full-time employees (first 30 employees waived) if they do not provide PPACA approved health insurance. This is a lot of new power granted to the IRS and this is the primary reason the IRS is hiring thousands of new agents.
Section 1321 of the PPACA describes federally-facilitated exchanges and state-federal partnership exchanges – like the exchange the state of Illinois has chosen to establish. In these types of exchanges, the IRS is granted no authority to provide APTC’s or to levy excise taxes on any employer in that state for not providing PPACA approved health insurance. Since the crafters of the PPACA assumed that every state would willingly establish a state-based exchange, there was no money appropriated for federally-facilitated exchanges.
Thus far 36 states have chosen not to open a state-based health insurance exchange. As such federally-facilitated exchanges have been implemented in those states regardless of the wishes of those state’s legislatures.
The illegal action taken by the IRS
Here’s the kicker, in order to ‘fix’ this legal ‘opt out’ that section 1321 provides to states that choose not to open a state-based exchange. The Internal Revenue Service finalized a proposed rule on the 2 year anniversary of the passage of the PPACA that offers APTC’s -Advance Premium Tax Credits – through exchanges “established under section 1311 OR 1321 of the PPACA. Those six characters—”or 1321″—constitute as Cato’s Michael Cannon correctly describes “an unconstitutional and as such illegal rewriting of the statute.” By issuing tax credits where Congress did not authorize them, this rule triggers billlions of dollars in taxpayer provided “subsidies” and imposes excise taxes on employers with 50 or more full-time employees in all 50 states. Whether they have a state-based, state-federal partnership or federally facilitated exchange. Since the IRS is not a Legislative branch, this action was illegal. It was not authorized by Congress and as such it should not stand.
Worse yet, President Obama is following this new proposed rule as if it was codified law. This illegal action taken by the IRS and President Obama’s support of it is the crux of the Halbig v Burwell case. If the U.S. Court of Appeals upholds the rule of law in this case it will mean the end of Obamacare in 36 states. In turn, it may be the final death blow to an unconstitutional and wildy unpopular law.
July 22, 2014 UPDATE
D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals rules in favor of Halbig plaintiffs! The Obama administration will of course appeal this decision to the entire court. Seven of that court’s 11 judges were nominated by Democratic presidents, including four by Barack Obama. If the Obama administration fails there, the case will head to the U.S. Supreme Court. If the Obama adminstration loses there, 57 million Americans who work for an employer and 8 million individuals in more than three dozen states will be FREED from the unconstitutional tyranny of the Obamacare individual and employer mandate. This will also be the beginning of the end of Obamacare. We still have a long battle coming on this issue.
Read today’s ruling from the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals here >
Hours after the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals struck down the illegaly granted IRS subsidies the 4th Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond, Virginia upheld them.
If Obama wins in the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals there will then be two cases ruling against the rule of law in the lower courts. However, there are three other cases that need to be decided in the lower courts. They are King V. Burwell, Indiana v. IRS and Pruitt v. Burwell. If the rule of law prevails in either of those court decisions there will then be descending opinions in the lower courts. This would then force the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case. Even if the case reaches the U.S. Supreme Court, there is the problem of chief justice John Roberts. In June of 2012 he committed one of the greatest miscarriages of justice in U.S. history by changing the word ‘fine’ to ‘tax’ and allowing the unconstitutional Obamacare law to move “forward”. Needless to say, I have no faith in the U.S. Supreme Court. Pray for justice.
Update: On Friday, November 7, 2014 the U.S. Supreme Court agreed to hear the King V. Burwell case early next year with a decision most likely being rendered in June of 2015. Again, pray for justice.