Donald Trump, Socialism and preexisting conditions.

Well it has now been more than two weeks since my last post which proved by linking to Donald Trump’s written health care policy proposals that Mr. Trump does not support a “Single Payer Socialized Medicine” system. Since I wrote that piece I have been basking in the hate of Ted Cruz supporters – many of whom neither read my piece or Mr. Trump’s written policy proposals linked within. So, I have decided to write a new piece for all who are still interested in my take on health care policy. I can only assume that does not include hundreds of my fellow Conservative former friends and allies who are Ted Cruz supporters who have since blocked me on Facebook and Twitter after leaving encouraging comments like “you’re a f*cking liar and a traitorous piece of sh*t“. “Believe me” I’m “feeling the burn” and it’s not coming from Bernie Sanders supporters or an untreated STD.

The hate is unfortunately coming from my fellow Conservatives who are so ideologically opposed to a Trump presidency that they are willing to ignore his current proposals and instead find every opinion piece they can find that links to interviews Trump gave 15 years ago (or earlier) in a failed attempt to prove that Mr. Trump supports a “Single Payer Socialized Medicine” system. Even though Mr. Trump has stated repeatedly in print and verbally that he abandoned consideration of such a plan for the United States long before writing his current proposals contained in chapter 8 of his 2011 book entitled “Time To Get Tough” and chapter 7 of his 2015 book entitled “Crippled America”.

Providing a safety net is NOT “supporting Socialized Medicine for all Americans

What you will find in those two chapters of Mr. Trump’s most recent books are free market health care reform proposals that are remarkably similar to Ted Cruz’s health care reform proposals. I wrote about Ted Cruz’s “Healthy Choice Act of 2015” shortly after it was released last year. Both candidates propose the following:

1.) Repeal of the PPACA (Obamacare)
2.) Repeal of the McCarran Ferguson Act so health insurance can be sold across state lines.
3.) Expansion of Health Savings Accounts to promote price transparency & accountability.
4.) Tort (or Medical Malpractice Reform)
5.) Mr. Trump has most recently added private sector reforms to be made to our broken Veteran’s Administration health care system specifically because it, like all other Single Payer systems is an unmitigated disaster!

It is unfortunately rather difficult for the average person to determine the similarities between both candidate’s plans because neither Mr. Trump or Mr. Cruz have their health care policy proposals linked on their websites and that needs to change yesterday.

Preserving and reforming existing health care safety nets

There’s something else you will discover when you compare Mr. Trump’s proposals to Mr. Cruz’s proposals. Neither candidate proposes abolishing our existing health care safety nets. They include the following:

1.) Ronald Reagan’s E.M.T.A.L.A which requires every hospital that accepts Medicare and Medicaid (which is nearly all of them) to care for any patient who presents with an emergency “regardless of their ability to pay.” Oh my gosh! Reagan was a SOCIALIST!??

2.) Medicaid which provides either taxpayer funded access to health care services or subsidized private health insurance on a sliding income scale for the indigent and the developmentally disabled.

3.) S.C.H.I.P which was a bipartisan piece of legislation written to ensure that children of parents – who make too much to qualify for Medicaid but too little to afford private health insurance – have access to health insurance on a sliding income scale.

So, either Donald Trump and Ted Cruz are both ‘Socialists’ seeking to ‘subvert our Constitution’ by implementing ‘Socialized Medicine’ or far too many Americans are either ignorant about actual health care policy or willfully ignorant and choose instead to promulgate a false narrative to advance an agenda…..but I digress.

Two options for covering preexisting conditions in the individual marketplace

What I found lacking in Donald Trump’s proposals but clearly outlined in Ted Cruz’s proposals is specifically how preexisting conditions will be covered in the individual health insurance market place. Senator Cruz proposes a preexisting solution to preexisting conditions. He relies upon protections that existed before the PPACA as outlined in sections 2741 and 2744 of 1996 HIPPA law for those who are HIPAA qualified. This means that they have maintained existing coverage for at least 18 months with no lapse in coverage of more than 63 days. These insured members would have guaranteed access to coverage for preexisting conditions in the individual marketplace via:

A). A state high risk health insurance pool – which existed in 35 states long before the PPACA
B.) A guarantee issue individual mandate – which existed in 10 states – including Ohio – long before the PPACA
C.) A state mandated replacement policy – which is required to be offered in the states that did not have one of the two aforementioned options under section 2744 of HIPAA.

That is one option that Mr. Trump could consider. That option would require rebuilding and funding that preexisting state infrastructure since that was largely abolished because it was no longer necessary upon full implementation of the PPACA in 2014.

This brings me to Mr. Trump’s other option. To keep our existing national 90 day open enrollment period which was originally an idea used by 10 different states long before the PPACA. However, if Mr. Trump chooses this option, he absolutely must correct the mistake made by the ‘masterminds’ who wrote the PPACA. That mistake was not allowing health insurers to underwrite normal paper throughout the year. This was allowed in states like Ohio (and 9 other states) long before the PPACA. In fact, that’s where the ‘authors’ of the PPACA got the idea of a short annual open enrollment period for those with preexisting conditions. The state of Ohio was doing that for all Ohio residents for years before the PPACA. However, Ohio regulators did not stop health insurers from underwriting other coverage throughout the year. So, people with preexisting conditions that were severe enough to warrant a decline (cancer, diabetes, morbid obesity etc.) could purchase health insurance during the annual open enrollment window and everyone else could buy health insurance throughout the rest of the year whenever they wanted. Best part? That system worked remarkably well without the unconstitutional imposition of an ‘individual mandate’ to purchase health insurance.

By allowing health insurers to underwrite other consumers with less severe preexisting conditions like hypertension or hyperlipidimia throughout the rest of the year, health insurers were able to mitigate the risk they would have to assume during the annual open enrollment period. The ‘masterminds’ who wrote the PPACA decided that part wasn’t such a good idea to include. You know, because they didn’t want those ‘evil’ insurance companies ‘discriminating’ against anyone. How exactly is that ‘discriminating’ when the carriers were still offering those consumers coverage and covering their preexisting conditions? It’s not, but the masterminds of the PPACA decided to place their Leftist ideology ahead of time tested and proven business models. Surely we can do better.

To learn more about preexisting conditions visit: TruthAboutPreexistingConditions.com

March 2, 2016 UPDATE: Mr. Trump posts healthcare reform plans on his website. No “Single Payer Socialized Medicine” included.

 

 

Advertisements

22 Comments

Filed under Uncategorized

22 responses to “Donald Trump, Socialism and preexisting conditions.

  1. Jason

    I’ll ask a simple question here. Why must we judge every other candidate by their past actions and votes, but with Trump we are to ignore everything he has stated, every politician he has donated too, and every lawsuit he has been a part of and we are to believe his new platform? People don’t trust Trump because they are holding him to the same standards we are expected to hold other politicians too, yet Trump supporters feel like that is unfair?

    • Jason,

      That’s not unfair at all. This is the primary and we should vet all candidates. I’m simply correcting the record with my knowledge base.

    • Martin

      Because the standards are a false equivalency, that’s why, Jason. A politician sets and maintains the environment that business people are forced to survive in. That survival includes “greasing the skids” as some call it. The “past actions and votes” of politicians are to the point.

  2. Thanks for the good read Steven. I’m on a 30-day ban from FB because of a picture I posted FOUR YEARS AGO!!! but I wanted to let you know how much I liked this piece.

  3. Margaret

    Awesome article. Thank you for taking the time and doing the research to write it!

  4. Thank You for a reasoned, honest explanation of health care policy without an agenda. I have supported both Cruz and Trump and am well aware of the attacks that have come your way from other Cruz supporters. Integrity is a trait that should be rewarded rather than attacked. Thank you for continuing to educate us on Obamacare and how to replace it.

  5. Pingback: Healthcare Expert C. Steven Tucker Tries In Vain To Explain That Cruz and Trump’s Healthcare Plan Are Not Dissimilar |

  6. Geoff C. the Saltine

    Csteven thanks for making the line clear between Trump and Cruz which is very small as I see it on this issue. I am glad Mr. Hat put this on his front page. If you want to see some real dust ups read some of the comments between Trump and Cruz on iotw it’s been a real knock down drag out war for months. I like your comment vote your conscience in the primary due your duty in the general. To many Cruz people and other GOP likes plan on sitting out the general if Trump is the nominee which means killary wins, that is not doing your duty. The left has to be stopped before its to late.

  7. Excellent.
    There are two sides to this health care problem. Money grubbers on one side, and pathetic parasites on the other. A classic bell curve, with most people in the middle area.
    We have the doctors without borders program in africa, but that would undermine profits in America if done here. Not to mention any potential lawsuits if, god forbid, some parasite here in America doesn’t think their free or low cost care was up to snuff.
    One thing that isn’t talked about is the medical cost of criminals we see on cops. So far this year, in Chicago there has been 102 murders, and 400 people shot and wounded. http://heyjackass.com/ has the statistics.

    A healthy body and a healthy mind needs to forced on the population.
    If you can’t do 20 pushups and 20 situps, no welfare check.
    Donald Trump is going to be President, because he is acting like a boss.
    Someone needs to step up and act like a boss with self healthcare. Just in case anyone thinks its impossible; check out this 98 year old dude.

    • Thank you. Yeah, tell me about it. I live 30 miles west of Chicago in the People’s Republik of Madiganistan. That’s all we hear about. Murder and mayhem in the “gun control” capitol of the nation. Democrats put the (D) in dumb.

      • If 20 pushups and 20 situps could be mandated with employment, give everyone already employed six months to comply, and all new hires have to show the ability to perform the exercises.

        Even the politicians have to meet this requirement. Oh boy that gave me goose bumps. 😉

  8. Reblogged this on dick johnson and commented:
    One thing that isn’t being discussed is personal responsibility. Most are responsible with their own health. Unfortunately many are not. I know there are circumstances beyond our control, but many are manageable.
    Good behavior should be rewarded. If you have good credit, a good credit interest rate, bank CD should be available. If you can meet minimum exercise requirements, then a steep discount on insurance should be available.
    Reward good behavior.

  9. Pingback: What would TrumpCare look like? | Cathy R Fouse Blog

  10. Pingback: Donald Trump posts health care reform plans on his site. No Socialized Medicine. Will Senator Cruz do the same? | C. Steven Tucker.WordPress.com

  11. Pingback: Innocent patients die from Medicare, Medicaid looting – Romeo Henry's Blog

  12. keith

    Mr. Tucker,

    I just came across your blog as a link from another site. One solution not mentioned by anybody that I have seen for the pre-existing conditions predicament is found in the group plan method. Upon joining an existing group, ones pre-existing conditions are covered (not all plans and probably fewer new ones under BarryCaresLess). Insurance companies, as you know, want more “average” enrollees and are in the business of (supposedly) spreading risk. As such, to the extent that it is true, assembling of large random groups would allow for mitigation of high individual risk. The USA as a whole could be viewed as a group (or group of groups). Pieces of that group (separate groups) could be distributed or bid for by the insurance companies to insure. Think of a reverse auction in which large numbers of people are assembled and offered to the insurance companies as groups who are then offered coverage for a given rate until all or most okay the amount of premium. Participants can preselect the range in which they would purchase insurance. A guide to allow the individuals to know what the insurance should cost would be developed across the web (as things typically are). People not buying insurance would be liable for their medical bills and not dischargeable under bankruptcy.
    Other aspects of the four items you mention above that you list as existing safety net policies could and should be eliminated. No required coverage items just buy what you want.

  13. As soon as I noticed this web site I went on reddit to share some of the love with them.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s